Cisco says companies fixing previously known protocol issue should also patch against remote-code execution issue.

Cisco is urging organizations to immediately address a critical flaw in its network switches running IOS and IOS XE software amid reports of widespread attacks against the devices in several countries.

The on Monday published a security advisory on the remote code execution flaw (CVE-2018-0171) in the Smart Install function in Cisco IOS and IOS XE software.

Cisco described the flaw — first disclosed March by Embedi — as an issue that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a denial-of-service condition or to execute code of their choice on an affected device. Emedi on March 29 claimed it had found some 250,000 network devices that were to the issue.

The flaw is separate from a protocol misuse issue also related to the Smart Install function that Cisco first issued an advisory about on Feb 14, 2017 and has updated a couple of times. It is apparently the protocol misuse issue that attackers have been exploiting in the recent attacks,  not the RCE flaw.

However, Cisco has urged organizations to address both issues immediately, citing widespread and ongoing attacks against its switches in multiple countries. “While we have only observed attacks leveraging the protocol misuse issue, recently, another vulnerability in the Cisco Smart Install Client was disclosed and patched,” the company said in a blog. “While mitigating the protocol misuse issue, customers should also address this vulnerability.”

‘Don’t Mess With Our Elections’

Reuters over the weekend reported that some 200,000 Cisco switches had been compromised in attacks in multiple countries. Among those impacted were centers and ISPs in Iran and Russia where the attackers displayed a US flag on the screens of compromised systems with the message, “Don’t mess with our elections.”

IRNA, Iran’s official news agency said the attacks impacted at least 3,500 in the country. The agency quoted officials within the country as saying that attackers had tampered with configuration settings on the devices to cause systems to become unavailable.

Cisco had first warned about the protocol misuse issue that the threat actors leveraged in the attacks last February. The company has described the issue as something that attackers can abuse to modify the TFTP server setting to steal and modify configuration files, replace the operating system image, and set up command.

“Although this is not a vulnerability in the classic sense, the misuse of this protocol is an attack vector that should be mitigated immediately,” Cisco had noted in an April 5 blog warning about the surge recent attacks targeting the issue.

According to the company, attackers have been using search engines like Shodan to scan for vulnerable devices throughout 2017 and the early part of this year. Though, Cisco has long ago provided instructions on how organizations can find vulnerable routers and mitigate the protocol misuse issue, some 168,000 devices worldwide remain exposed to the issue when Cisco conducted a recent scan. These devices need to be addressed immediately, the company has noted.

Cisco said that several threat actors, including nation-state groups like the Dragonfly campaign targeting western energy firms have been exploiting the protocol issue in widespread attacks in countries. Some of the attacks have targeted critical infrastructure organizations, Cisco has warned.

No Attacks Yet

So far, there is no evidence that the RCE flaw in Smart Install has been exploited. However, proof-of-concept code for exploiting is available. The vulnerability stems from improper validation of packet data. Attackers can exploit it by sending a specially crafted Smart Install message to a vulnerable device via TCP port 4786 causing the device to reload. Attackers could also exploit the flaw to execute arbitrary code or to cause a denial of service condition, Cisco said.

Cisco did not respond to multiple requests for comment on whether the RCE flaw is being exploited in any of the ongoing attacks considering the significant number of devices that Embedi has reported as being exposed to the issue.

However, some security researchers said that the flaw indeed appears to be different from the one being exploited.

“This attack took advantage of Cisco’s Smart Install protocol,” says Bob Noel, director of strategic relationships and marketing for Plixer. “Organizations were provided guidance that Cisco did not consider this a vulnerability, and therefore no changes would be done to the protocol.”

Organizations were instructed to simply turn off the protocol, and those that remain exposed are those who have not done so, he says.

The damage an attacker could do with this would depend on their access privileges. By changing the startup configuration, an attacker could force a reboot of a switch and stop all traffic forwarding. “In a case where an attacker gained full administrative rights to a router/switch, they would be able to change the configuration of the device, add or remove security policies, or make any other changes,” Noel says.

Ashley Stephenson, CEO of Corero Network Security, says available evidence suggests attackers would not have needed to exploit the RCE flaw in the recent attacks. “While there is no proof, this was likely accomplished by just misusing the protocol,” he says.

The attacks show why it is important for organizations to understand the profile of systems exposed to the Internet. If it is exposed, someone will attempt to compromise it. “There is no excuse for exposing unnecessary ports or services, like TCP 4786 for Cisco Smart Install Client,” Stephenson says.

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018  -  7Bc4ea0bb7 059e 4ef6 a860 71a7f500d0da 7D InteropITX18 Logo HorizDates Color383 - Attackers Exploit Cisco Switch Issue as Vendor …

Join Dark Reading LIVE for a two-day Cybersecurity Crash Course at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security . Check out the agenda here. Register with Promo Code DR200 and save $200.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year … View Full Bio

More Insights



Source link

No tags for this post.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here